Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Greta Arn Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W W L L W L
Form
L W W L L W W W L LHead To Head: Garrigues 3 - 0 Arn
They have played 6 sets in total, with Garrigues winning 6 and Arn winning 0. The last match between Garrigues and Arn was at the Estoril Open - Estoril, 27-04-2011, Second, Clay with Anabel Medina Garrigues getting the victory 6-2 1-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 3 |
| Greta Arn | 0 |
Estoril Open - Estoril(27-04-2011)
6
2
1
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fett VS Ruzic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Bellucci PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 1-0 ret. |
Stats 
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Greta Arn
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
9 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
41
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Greta Arn
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Greta Arn
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 33 | Games Won | 19 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 0:19:32 | Average Match Time | 0:19:32 |
| 59% (92/155) | 1st Serve % | 56% (100/178) |
| 71% (65/92) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (61/100) |
| 60% (38/63) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (32/78) |
| 52% (11/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 48% (85/178) | Return Points Win % | 34% (52/155) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Anabel Medina Garrigues Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Jade Suvrijn
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
89 of
138)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
67 of
138)
129
Total Points Won
113
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alla Kudryavtseva
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
72%
(
68 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Gioia Barbieri
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
46%
(
34 of
74)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
51%
(
59 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
104
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Olga Govortsova
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lourdes Dominguez-Lino
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
52%
(
17 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francoise Abanda
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
83
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
An-Sophie Mestach
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sesil Karatantcheva
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Greta Arn Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 5-7 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Greta Arn
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Greta Arn
Player
Cristiana Ferrando
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Greta Arn
Player
Marine Partaud
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Greta Arn
Player
Ritage Faizy
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
17 of
27)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (400/322) | Win/Loss | 55% (358/291) |
| 55% (911/743) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (807/674) |
| 52% (7850/7235) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6992/6560) |
| 47% (131/145) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (118/97) |
| 65% (220/119) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (151/119) |
| 47% (32/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (69/58) |
| 44% (17/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 54% (20/17) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 441 | Aces Total | 872 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 567 | Total Double Faults | 1111 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 40.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 515.26 |
| 65% (17266/26633) | 1st Serve % | 59% (11069/18918) |
| 60% (10415/17266) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (7133/11069) |
| 47% (4413/9372) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3532/7850) |
| 48% (1630/3415) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1051/2351) |
| 45% (12659/27827) | Return Points Win % | 44% (8476/19159) |
| 47% (45/50) | Slam W/L | 51% (40/38) |
| 46% (62/73) | Masters W/L | 51% (36/35) |
| 43% (10/13) | Cups W/L | 55% (6/5) |
| 59% (245/173) | Main Tour W/L | 58% (161/115) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (38/13) | Challenger W/L | 55% (107/88) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 55% (391/707) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (355/643) |
| 83% (5/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 52% (69/132) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (73/131) |
| 46% (99/215) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (94/187) |
| 85% (407/344) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (358/311) |
| 15% (407/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (358/47) |
| 17% (315/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (290/46) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
